Rating & Mating Game – US abuse of Rating agencies
Ref: 09-038A of 14.Dec.2009 Author: Anil Selarka (Kalidas)
Download PDF File from Box.net on side bar or Scribd
Some countries do anything to get their aim achieved. They go to any length. The difficulty with the militarily powerful country like United States is that they abuse their power, become arrogant and destroy rest of the world with self centered policies. They also conceal their real intention as if they are fighting a strategic war.
There is absolutely no doubt that United States is in extremely tight corner financially, politically on home front and militarily in Afghanistan and Iraq. Its major concern on Foreign Exchange front is severe pressure on dollar. At the moment, it is trying to keep the interest rate low by printing its way out. The question is – How long? Sooner or later, it will have to come to the market for borrowing trillions of dollars so printed during last 16 months.
If China and Japan do not buy the Treasury bonds or notes, the rates will shoot up to glaring heights, placing enormous pressure on housing market. The recent visit of President Obama and Timothy Geithner (Treasury Secretary) was not for climate change or green technology. Both China and Japan have served them feelers that they will not longer be buying T Notes or Bonds in USD due to extremely high risk of devaluation and extremely low yield. This is why both President and Treasury Secretary have visited those creditor countries to pacify them. Otherwise, what Treasury Secretary has to do with carbon emission or climate change? He is facing worst climate back home.
So, instead of convincing the other countries, notably China and Japan, it is trying another strategy used during Asian Crisis. Rating and Mating game. Instead of telling China or Japan to buy US$, it will force downgrades of strategic and vulnerable countries, and indirectly telling the major Forex owners not to buy their currencies, in fact sell them. If they sell those currencies, what would they buy? One is selling something against something. Here it is US dollar. In other words, by causing downgrades of those countries below investment grade, the major creditor countries will be indirectly persuaded to buy US dollar even if it is not desirable, almost bankrupt, yields almost nothing and yet it will be made the only alternative.
For instance, Greece considered one of the tiniest and yet corrupts country where one can influence the government policies by controlling the pockets of finance ministers and other cabinet ministers. After Iceland, it was Dubai, now Greece, Spain and United Kingdom. Further, the dollar is pushed up in paper trades – by causing some affiliated or TARP recipient banks to buy the $ Index which is set up against 6 currencies – Euro, GBP, Can $, Aus$, Yen and Swedish Kroner. (I still do not understand why SKR is there in the index. There are bigger currencies like RMB, INR, and South African Rand, which represent nearly 60% of world economies.
The rating agencies like Standard and Poor and Moody would never downgrade US corporations so easily. In spite of US incurring huge trillion dollars of deficits, its status will be retained at AAA level. Why not? US has incurred debt in its own currency US$ – if there is demand, it will simply print out the dollars and hand over to the countries creditors. No country in the world has incurred default on debt denominated in its own domestic currency, because they can print their way out.
If any non-US country incurs more debt into its own currency, these rating agencies act in collusion and threaten to downgrade that country. As recently as now, India, who holds almost $300 billions of Forex reserve, bought 200 tons of gold from IMF, recorded no banking or financial problems, having fastest economic growth of 7.9% and healthy property sector, was threatened with the downgrade even below investment grade due to rising budget deficits.
How about Japan which has highest level of national debt – almost 170% of its GDP – could still be rated Investment grade AA+? Only because Japan is appeasing United States by buying US treasury on demand.
Of late the relations between Britain and USA are not that cordial. Britain is nursing the feeling that it was wrongly goaded into war. It also feels that the present banking problems at home are mainly due to United States. It is almost certain, despite pronouncement to the contrary, that Britain and United States are drifting apart. This is why UK is sought to be downgraded by the US based rating agencies like S&P and Moody’s.
The message is “if you do not meet out political objectives, we will downgrade you and force you bear higher interest cost and devalue your currencies.” Your weakness is my strength – is what they convey.
If the people sell dollars, they buy gold as last resort or buy other English speaking countries currencies like British Pound. Instead of losing “reserve currency” status to either Euro or GBP, US is indirectly influencing rating agencies to downgrade UK so that people do not buy GBP, in fact sell it, instead of holding on to it. The history shows that only two currencies in the world – GBP and US$ – have played alternate role of global reserve currency.
There is a precedent too. During Asian crisis, every thing was pushed down – currencies, bonds, equities, properties and even Gold (because Asians have affinity for gold). The only currency rising was US$. If you cause fire, close down all doors and windows except one window – that is US$ – the people will rush into that window.
Look at the full list of Countries’ rated by S&P. Almost all countries almost bankrupt running into with giant losses in trillions of dollars are listed AAA or AA, the highest investment grade. The dollar block countries who have their currencies tied to US$, are also rated AA+ because they are loyal to USA.
- The creditor country like China is rated just A+ in spite of having $2.3 trillions in Forex reserve. Can you believe that? US with giant black hole of $ 2 trillions is still rated AAA and China fully dressed up with $ 2.3 trillions of surplus parked in Forex, is rated 5 notch below to A+.
- India is rated at BBB- , slightly above investment grade, in spite of having 7.9% growth in GDP and $300 billions of Forex reserve.
- Russian Federation is rated BBB+ in spite of having huge Forex and Gold Reserve.
- South Africa is also rated lower at A+.
- Almost all commodity countries (except Canada and Australia) are rated lower investment grades. The western countries want cheaper commodities, They rate these countries downwards, so that their Interest cost goes higher, capital markets go lower, and as result currencies go lower to make their buying of commodities cheaper in USD terms.
Almost all funds and pension funds have in charter a provision not to invest into below investment grade countries. The moment country like India is downgraded below investment grade; there will be huge sell off by funds that will bring down Indian Rupee and also entire capital market. The interest rates are also forced up as consequence.
GDP is also understated in respect of commodity countries. For instance, in India 50Million tons of potato will be valued at Rs 4 per pound or just 10 Cents per pound. The same potato will be valued in USA at $ 2 per pound or nearly 20 times intrinsic value. The US GDP looks better and India’s much smaller. Then, these rating agencies use grossly understated GDP numbers to compare with their budget or trade deficits. Obviously, they will look taller, because base is very small compared to western countries.
It is high time the developing countries understand this “Rating and Mating” game and take actions to protect themselves – one of them will be to impose blanket ban for 5 to 15 years on those mischievous rating agencies. Once they are kicked out while playing dirty war games, they will be put on notice not to cause troubles in those fast developing countries. The world will be a better place to live in.
Kalidas (Anil Selarka)
Hong Kong, Ref: 09-038A of 2009.12.10
Blog: http://anilselarka.com
Book Web: http://www.subprimeresolved.com


Link to this page





For GN (regarding the article by Jim Rogers on India)
The article is written on 6th March 2001, and believe me a whole lot of things have changed since then. So I wonder how much to trust these articles.
Regards,
Atul
Singapore
Atul
20 Dec 09 at 2:31 AM
Dear Sir
I’ve been following ur blog for last few months or so.
Im getting a feeling that ur predictions are not gonna get materialised. Americans are smart asses to marshal their way around to save themselves.
Im not doubting your intelligence although, its an irony that we are living in this world.
However, I have a question. If ur predictions dont really come thru and Americans find some way out to save themselves. Can we say “the happy days of abundant liquidity” are going to be back ?
Regards
Alankrit
Mumbai – Hindusthan
Kalidas Says ….Monday, December 21, 2009
May be you are right, may be wrong – only time will tell. I express my opinion so that investing people can take calculated risk on their investment.
You are already in the happy days of abundant liquidity. If liquidity had been tight, the interest rates would have been in double digits. The interest rates world over in $, GBP, Euro and Yen are almost near Zero. That shows the extent of liquidity in the system.
American were smart asses, as you say, yes they are asses after all. If they were really that smart, we would not have seen these terrible days today when the banks and governments are both bankrupt.
Alankrit
18 Dec 09 at 10:36 PM
While exploring about Gold. I hit this article http://www.jimrogers.com/content/stories/articles/india.html
A lot of it is right. Corruption, Execution bottle necks, issues due to vast diversity (linguistic, caste,cultural, minority), illitracy, gender discrimination, our dependence on US for jobs (IT/ITES) especially ~60% of educated youth from past 10 years(directly/indirectly) , uncontrolled population growth, food-water-energy shortage, growing gap between rich and poor, growing worried middle class, weak central leadership due to coalition politics. Adding to this politicians , religious groups and media who try to take advantage of every bad situation to their advantage.
Everything is done for votes, follower base or viewership.
As per you “Where do we see India in next 30 or 40 years? ”
GN.
Redmond
Kalidas Says ….Tuesday, December 15, 2009
I do not know in 30 or 40 years, but in next 5 years, amongst top 5, in 7 years, amongst top 3. Provided there are no religious riots.
Others’ weaknesses are also India’s strength. US. UK, Japan are on long term decline. China may be better but not to the extent of India.
They (US, UK, Japan) will be displaced to last 5 amongst first 10 (that is No. 6 to 10). European Union will also fall apart and will be reverted to original position. In that case, France will perform better than even Germany.
Any country that is dependent on domestic demand for next 5 years will reach the top. India is leading one, followed by Brazil and Indonesia. Russia is good but not well managed.
China will suffer heavy losses in USA, so will Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, South Korea and Thailand.
Only Australia will be unhurt. Its currency will be the strongest.
GN
15 Dec 09 at 2:35 AM
Kalidasji
I have been reading all your post for nearly 24 months now. You have been predicting dooms day in many aspects, but none have materialised till now. I guess USA is smarter in finding (or rather bullying) it’s way out of every situation so far. This has also been the case with them for the last approx 100 years if not more. This has led to the proverbial saying ” Unt (Camel) agar bait bhi jaye to kutte se do goona uncha hota hai” being applicable to them.
I do hope that we see a different camel around quickly or atleast a bunch of zebra on equal footing without this camel.
Xavier
UAE
Xavier
11 Dec 09 at 11:25 PM
This one is truly a Gem!!!!
Great writing as always
Martin
Goa, India
Martin
11 Dec 09 at 6:52 AM
Dear Sir,
At present I am reading book “The Secrete History Of The American Empire” by John Perkins (Famous through Confession of An Economic Hit Man)
In this book he describe the same thing how US using privet agencies for there political & economical agendas.
Thanks.
Parag
Surat India
Kalidas Says ….Friday, December 11, 2009
History repeats itself. Hey, do you get time to read so much in India? I thought that Indians see lot of serials.
Parag, Surat
11 Dec 09 at 12:51 AM
Thank you for this excellent article. I have a doubt about the solution proposed by you to impose blanket ban on these agencies.
We all know that these are mainly large ‘US based’ agencies, and hence they have attained Global Reputation(?). The major chunk of our FDI is from the USA. How developing countries imposing a ban on these credit agencies will help? It will only result in leaving these countries without any rating. Do you think global investors will dare to invest into a country with no rating at all? It will be like Indian Cricket league, which is not recognised by ICC. Did they get any major investor for their games?
Hence, in addition to imposing ban, a global marketing campaign by Indian Government (clearly revealing the GDP facts & figures mentioned in your analysis) may bring in the desired FDI.
Milind,
Pune, India.
Kalidas Says ….Friday, December 11, 2009
Well written comment. The money will disappear fast in USA, so little chance of getting FDI or FII from there.
Further, if the rates rise in USA, the properties too will rise (surprised?) The reason is that the people will look at soaring cost of interest if they did not lock in lower rates now. They will go for property and try to lock in lower rates for 30 years. Thus, the money will start going back into property sector in USA, not overseas for investment.
Not every Agency will be banned. if there is one erring agency, it will be singled out. First, there will be a strong note of dissent, then warning and then only actions. No rating agency want to lose giant country like India. There will be rating from other agencies like Fitch from Germany.
Yes, there will be initial “hulla ho” but then the government has to play its card well. They will categorically say that it was only for erring rating agency. It was an exception, not rule.
SafeMil
10 Dec 09 at 11:37 PM
Sir,
Thanks for excellent article.
Regards,
Jay, London
Jay
10 Dec 09 at 11:10 AM
Nice Article Sir.
-Venkat
Bangalore
Venkat Gurukrishna
10 Dec 09 at 11:08 AM
Excellent Sir.
Hope some knowledgable people from Indian Finance Ministry or RBI read this.
Shiva
Bangalore
Shiva
10 Dec 09 at 9:48 AM